Socio-economic Profile of Equine Owner, Morphometric Characterization and Reproductive Performance of Indigenous Horses in Bangladesh



Abstract Views
322

Downloads
181

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Jul 7, 2023
Published Sep 26, 2023
10.24018/ejvetmed.2023.3.5.108

Abstract viewed = 322 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Background: The socio-economic importance of horses plays a decisive role in the dynamism of rural economies in remote regions of developing countries such as Bangladesh. Horses are particularly suitable for transportation and recreation in these areas.

Methods: The study was conducted from January to March 2023 in 200 randomly selected horse families concentrated in Sherpur, Jamalpur, Tangail, Sirajganj, Natore, and Noagoan districts of Bangladesh. After the necessary corrections and modifications, the final questionnaire was created based on the objectives of the study. The data were collected by respondents individually through personal interviews.

Results: The average number of horses per family was 1.18, with 70% of them being transported and only 11.5% participating in horse races. The average peak and the poor seasonal income of the farmers were recorded as BDT (12,920-6,717). On average, 2 kg of concentrate feed per day is supplied to each horse with forages in the morning and afternoon depending on the situation. All farmers practiced natural mating, but they did not perform vaccination (100%). The indigenous horse's face color was observed as a star of 30%, and 45% non-specific, while the coat color was chestnut 38.5%, bay 41.5%, grey 8%, pseudo-Albino 3.5%, black 3.5%, brown 1% and bay roan 4%. The chest stocking color was observed as black 48%, white 33%, black and white 19%. The average body length, chest girth, neck length, ear length, and body weight in the research region were 119.86±0.17 cm, 126.28±0.19 cm, 37.87±0.14 cm, 15.78±0.12 cm, and 160.43±0.65 kg. The body length and body weight (p=0.000) differ significantly from region to region. Age at first service, service per conception (no.), gestation length, and foaling interval were 2.34±0.07 years, 1.21±0.06 years, 10.91±0.33 months and 1.00±0.03 years, respectively.

Conclusions: Horses have enormous potential for livelihoods in rural areas, so it is important to preserve and improve horse genetic resources and ensure sustainable horse rearing in Bangladesh.

Keywords: Indigenous horse Morphometric traits Reproduction

References

  1. Kamanga P, Vedeld P, Sjaastad E. Forest incomes and rural livelihoods in Chiradzulu District, Malawi. Ecol Econ. 2009; 68(3):613–24.
     Google Scholar
  2. Leitch H, Ahuja V, Jabbar M. India’s livestock sector: Demand growth, food security and public investment-Issues and Options. Prepared for the World Bank, Washington D.C., USA. 2014.
     Google Scholar
  3. Gecho Y, Ayele G, Lemma T, Alemu D. Rural household livelihood strategies: options and determinants in the case of Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Soc Sci. 2014; 3(3):92–104.
     Google Scholar
  4. Taylor RE, Field TG. Scientific animal production. 10th ed. Pearson Education Limited; 2014.
     Google Scholar
  5. McManus C, Santos SA, Dallago BSL, Paiva SR, Martins RFS, Braccini Neto J, Marques PR, Abreu UGP. Evaluation of conservation program for the Pantaneiro horse in Brazil. Rev Bras de Zoote. 2013; 42:404-413. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982013000600004.
     Google Scholar
  6. Tennah S, Farnir F, Kafidi N, Nsangou IN, Leroy P, Antoine-Moussiaux N. Selective breeding of Arabian and Thoroughbred racehorses in Algeria: perceptions, objectives and practices of owners-breeders. Rev Bras de Zootec. 2014; 43:188-196.
     Google Scholar
  7. Biffa D, Woldemeskel M. Causes and factors associated with occurrence of external injuries in working equines in Ethiopia. Int J Appl Res Vet Med. 2006;4: 1-7.
     Google Scholar
  8. Swann WJ. Improving the welfare of working equine animals in developing countries. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2006; 100: 148-151.
     Google Scholar
  9. Yousef MK, Fielding O, Pearson RA. Physiological responses of the heat stress in donkeys, mules and horses in tropical agricultural development. Edinburgh: CTVM; 1991.
     Google Scholar
  10. Valerie SM, Jonckheer-Sheehy MVB. Management methods to improve the welfare of horses used in research. Source Pub.Med., 2015;44 (9): DOI: 10.1038/laban.741.
     Google Scholar
  11. Holmstrom M, Magunsson LE, Philipsson J. Variation in conformation of Swedish Warmblood horses on conformational characteristics if elite sport horses. Equi Vet Jour. 1990; 22: 186-193.
     Google Scholar
  12. Duchev Z, Groeneveld E. Improving the monitoring of animal genetic resources on National and International level. Arch Anim Breed. 2006; 49: 532-544.
     Google Scholar
  13. Lanari MR, Taddeo H, Domingo E, Centeno MP, Gallo L. Phenotypic differentiation of exterior traits in local Criollo goat population in Patagonia (Argentina). Arch Tierz Dummerstorf. 2003; 46: 347-356.
     Google Scholar
  14. Nozawa K, Amano T, Namikawa T, Hasnath MA, Mostafa KG, Faruque MO. Gene constitution of the native horses in Bangladesh. Rep Soc Res Native Livestock. 1988; 12: 123-34.
     Google Scholar
  15. Kefena E, Dessie T, Han JL, Kurtu MY, Rosenbom S, Beja-Pereira A. Morphological diversities and eco-zones of Ethiopian horse populations. Anim Genet Resour. 2012; 50: 1–12. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1017/S2078633612000021.
     Google Scholar
  16. Younan M, Zaidi A and Sikuku P. Camel Manual for Service Providers. Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI), Nairobi, Kenya, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  17. Fazili MR, Kirmani MA. The ignored working animal of Kashmir: status, constraints, research areas and ways for improvement. Asian J Anim Sci. 2011; 5(2): 91-101.
     Google Scholar
  18. Alam MP, Bhuiyan MSA, Bhuiyan AKFH. The socio-economic status of horse owners in rural areas of Bangladesh. The Agriculturists. 2015; 13: 46-52.
     Google Scholar
  19. Locke MM, Penedo MCT, Bricker SJ, Millon LV, and Murray JD. Linkage of the grey coat color locus to microsatellites on horse chromosome 25. Animal Genetics. 2002; 33: 329–337. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2052.2002.00885.x.
     Google Scholar
  20. Alam MP, Bhuiyan MSA, Bhuiyan AKFH. Management, constraints and prospects of indigenous horse development in Bangladesh. Vet Sci Res J. 2017; 8(1&2): 13-19. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/VSRJ/8.1and2/13-19.
     Google Scholar
  21. Anderson TM, McIlwraith CW. Longitudinal development of equine conformation from weanling to age 3 years in the thoroughbred. Equine Vet J. 2004; 36(7):563-570.
     Google Scholar
  22. Staniar WB, Kronfeld DS, Hoffman RM, Wilson JA, Harris PA. Weight prediction from linear measures of growing Thoroughbreds. Equine Vet J. 2004; 36:149-154.
     Google Scholar
  23. Gücüyener H, Akçapınar H. Some phenotypic and genetic parameters of Purebred Turkish Arabian horses raised in different stud farms. Journal of Lalahan Livestock Institute. 2011; 51:55-70.
     Google Scholar
  24. Yılmaz O, Ertuğrul M. Some morphological traits of Thoroughbred horses in Turkey. AgroLife Sci J. 2012; 1:1-5.
     Google Scholar
  25. Padilha FGF, Andrade AM, Fonseca ABM, Godoi FN, Almeida FQ, Ferreira AMR. Morphometric measurements and animal-performance indices in a study of racial forms of Brazilian Sport Horses undergoing training for eventing. Rev Bras de Zootec. 2017; 46:25-32.
     Google Scholar
  26. Brooks SA, Makvandi-Nejad S, Chu E, Allen JJ, Streeter C, Gu E, McCleery B, Murphy BA, Bellone R, Sutter NB. Morphological variation in the horse: defining complex traits of body size and shape. Anim Genet. 2010; 41Suppl 2:159-165.
     Google Scholar
  27. Sadek MH, Al-Aboud AZ, Ashmawy AA. Factor analysis of body measurements in Arabian horses. J Anim Breed Genet. 2006; 123: 369–377.
     Google Scholar
  28. Benhamadi M, Mezouar K, Benyarou M, Bouandas A, Gaouar S, bechir S. Morphometric characterization of the equine barbe breed in northwest of Algeria. Genet Biod J. 2017;1(2):48-65.
     Google Scholar
  29. Bowling AT, Ruvinsky A. Genetics of morphological traits and inherited disorders. In: The Genetics of the Horse. Season 4, CABI Pub., Oxon, 2000. pp. 71–84.
     Google Scholar
  30. Entin P. Do racehorses and greyhound dogs exhibit a gender difference in running speed? Equine Comp Ex Physiol. 2007;4(3):135-140. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478061507851036.
     Google Scholar
  31. Van Damme R, Entin P, Vanhooydonc B, Herrel A. Causes of sexual dimorphism in performance traits: A comparative approach. Evolut Ecol Res. 2008; 10(2):229-250.
     Google Scholar
  32. Alam MP, Bhuiyan MSA, Bhuiyan AKFH. Morphology, morphometry and reproductive characteristics of indigenous horses in Bangladesh. J Bio Agric Res. 2016; 11: 947-954.
     Google Scholar
  33. Singh MK, Yadav MP, Mehta NT. Breed characteristics of Marwari and Kathiawari horses. Indian J Anim Sci. 2002; 72(4): 319-323.
     Google Scholar
  34. Takaendengan BJ, Noor RR, Adiani S. Morphometric characterization of Minahasa horse for breeding and conservation purposes. Media Peternakan, 2011; 34(2): 99-104.
     Google Scholar
  35. Cervantes I, Baumung R, Molina A, Druml T, Gutiérrez JP, Sölkner J, Valera M. Size and shape analysis of morphofunctional traits in the Spanish Arab horse. J Livest Prod Sci. 2009; 125: 43-49.
     Google Scholar
  36. Komosa M, Purzyct H. Konik and Hucul horses: A comparative study of exterior measurements. J Anim Sci. 2009; 87: 2245-2254.
     Google Scholar
  37. Suontama M, Saastamoinen MT, Ojala M. Estimates of non-genetic effects and genetic parameters for body measures and subjectively scored traits in Finnhorse trotters. Livest Sci. 2009; 124: 205–209.
     Google Scholar
  38. Langlois B, Blouin C. Statistical analysis of some factors affecting the number of horse births in France. Reprod Nutr Dev. 2004; 44: 583-595.
     Google Scholar
  39. Jlassi M, Jemmali B, Ouzari HI, Lasfer F, Aoun BB, Ben Gara A. Reproductive Performance of Tunisian Arabian Stallions: A Study on the Variance and Estimation of Heritability. Animals, 2023; 13(6): 991.
     Google Scholar
  40. Valera, M., Esteves, L., Oom, M. M. & Molina, A. (2000). The Lusitano Native Thoroughbred: a genetic study of the important reproductive parameters in plans for conservation and improvement. Journal of Archivos de Zootecnia, 49 (185/186), 147-156.
     Google Scholar
  41. Warriach HM, Memon MA, Ahmad N, Norman1 ST, Ghafar A, Arif M. Reproductive performance of Arabian and Thoroughbred Mares under subtropical conditions of Pakistan. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2004; 27:932-936.
     Google Scholar
  42. Taveira RZ, da Mota MDS. Genetic and quantitative evaluation of breeding traits in thoroughbred mares. REDVET. Rev electrón de Vet. 2007; 1695-7504.
     Google Scholar
  43. Satue K, Felipe M, Mota J, Munoz A. Factors influencing gestational length in mares: A review. Livestock Science, 2011; 136: 287-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.09.011.
     Google Scholar
  44. Koterba AM, Drummond WH, Kosch PC. Equine Clinical Neonatology. London:Lea & Febiger; 1990.
     Google Scholar
  45. Hafez ESE. Reproduction in Farm Animals. 6th ed. USA: Lea & Febiger; 1993.
     Google Scholar
  46. Silva GCD, Nogueira CEWN, Mazzo HDC, Dallmann PBJ, Silva RBD, Curcio BDR. Factors affecting gestation length in mares – Literature review. Res Soc Dev. 2021; 10(5): 1-7.
     Google Scholar
  47. Anonymous. National Research Center on equines, 2003; Hissar (HARYANA) INDIA.
     Google Scholar
  48. The Brooke. Bearing a Heavy Burden. 2009.
     Google Scholar